8–12 Sept 2025
Hofburg Palace & Online
Europe/Vienna timezone
Register to join us at SnT2025!

Survey in Deep Learning Approaches for Local to Teleseismic Earthquake Detection and Phase Picking

P3.5-792
Not scheduled
20m
Zeremoniensaal

Zeremoniensaal

E-poster T3.5 Analysis of Seismic, Hydroacoustic and Infrasound Monitoring Data P3.5 Analysis of Seismic, Hydroacoustic and Infrasound Monitoring Data

Speaker

Maya Rehem (Bayesian Logic, Inc.)

Description

Deep learning approaches are effective for earthquake detection and phase picking. However, challenges in existing research include using non-uniform datasets, such as training on limited event distances and excluding noise samples. Models trained exclusively on local events often fail to perform well on teleseismic signals, while models trained only on signals struggle with robustness in the presence of noise. To address these limitations, we constructed a comprehensive dataset based on MLAAPDE, comprising approximately 800,000 2-minute waveform samples at 100 Hz. Half of the samples consist of event data with P, Pn, Pg, S, Sn, or Sg arrivals, while the other half are noise samples. Noise samples were selected as 2-minute windows with no cataloged phase arrivals before the first P-wave. The dataset spans local (0°–3°), regional (3°–30°), and teleseismic (30°+) distances. We train and evaluate four architectures—U-Net, U-Net with transformer, CNN-RNN, and CNN-RNN with transformer—on this dataset. Preliminary results indicate that the U-Net with transformer achieves the highest detection AUC (0.96). Trained on this local to teleseismic dataset, each model demonstrated robust detection across all distance ranges and low residual variability, underscoring the importance of diverse datasets in building generalized and reliable seismic detection models.

E-mail [email protected]

Authors

Maya Rehem (Bayesian Logic, Inc.) Dr Nimar Arora (Bayesian Logic, Inc.)

Presentation materials

There are no materials yet.